WILL ALBANESE DEFECT TO CHINA?

By David Hiscox at XYZ

The XYZ previously predicted that an Australian government would capitulate pathetically if and when it is faced with a Chinese invasion. Far from being sensationalist, the takeaway from Prime Minister Albanese’s is that we are never sensationalist enough.

From some random Dinosaur Media blog:

Anthony Albanese has hinted at a growing disconnect with the United States in a landmark speech observers say will annoy the Trump administration at a critical time in the strategic partnership.

The Prime Minister delivered a keynote speech in Sydney on Saturday night paying homage John Curtin on the 80th anniversary of the former Labor PM’s death, pointedly declaring that Australia would pursue its interests as a “sovereign nation” and not be “shackled to the past”.

“The great creative tension of Australian Labor is that while we love our history, we are not hostages to it,” Mr Albanese told the audience at the John Curtin Research Centre.

“We are links in a long chain — but we are not shackled to our past. We draw from it, we build on it and we learn from it.”

Mr Albanese described Mr Curtin as not just the leader who founded Australia’s long-held alliance with the US, but one who stood up against allied super powers, in pointed comments amid concerns over Australia’s relationship with America.

When a Prime Minister, who has trafficked nearly 2 million net new immigrants into Australia since his election in 2022, says we are not shackled by our past, this should raise alarm bells. Moreover, when said mass immigration fanatic attempts to retcon the legacy of one of the staunchest advocates of the White Australia Policy, it should be clear that national betrayal is on the cards.

Again if this strikes you as sensationalist, then so is one of the most experienced foreign policy analysts in the Australian MSM:

The Australian’s foreign editor Greg Sheridan wrote in a Sunday op-ed that Mr Albanese had “achieved something astonishing for an Australian Prime Minister, only ever accomplished once before”.

“He now knows, relates to and benefits from the leadership of the People’s Republic of China much better than he knows the leadership of the United States of America,” he wrote.

“The Prime Minister is about to embark on an extended trip to China, where he will have his fourth meeting with President Xi Jinping.

“By contrast, he has never met Donald Trump, who served as president for four years from 2016 and who was elected president again more than eight months ago.

“Albanese finds political comfort in Beijing and apparently political terror in Washington.”

This becomes clear when we dissect Albanese’s language:

“Or swapping an alliance with the old world for one with the new. It was a recognition that Australia’s fate would be decided in our region. It followed the decision Curtin had made in 1941 that Australia would issue its own declaration of war with Japan. Speaking for ourselves, as a sovereign nation.”

Mr Albanese added “we remember Curtin not just because he looked to America … we honour him because he spoke for Australia”.

“For Australia and for Labor, that independence has never meant isolationism,” he said.

“Choosing our own way, doesn’t mean going it alone.”

He’s right, but not in the way you think. Australia has three weeks’ domestic supply of fuel should our supply lines be cut. Given the vast distances between Australian towns and cities, millions of Australian residents would likely starve as logistics chains slowed to horse pace.

Australia possesses high tech weaponry, but as Iran demonstrated recently, the most advanced missile defences can be overwhelmed. Israel was one day away from running out of air defence missiles. Without resupply nor the industrial capacity to sustain a war of attrition, the Chinese have made clear that we don’t have enough ships, we don’t have enough missiles.

Nor does the US. In a war of attrition, by the time Chinese forces were ready to invade Australia, US forces would already be effectively cut off, and focused on defending the continental United States.

In such a situation, a political class obsessed with sex quotas, playing dress ups, and giving our country away to political aborigines would cave in about three seconds. It is therefore my contention that China will never invade Australia because it simply won’t need to.

However, Albanese’s speech indicates that an Australian government may well defect ahead of time. When Albanese says “choosing our own way, doesn’t mean going it alone,” who else can he possibly mean? Europe’s militaries and its demographics are a shadow of their former selves, and focused solely on Russia. A pivot back to Europe would put Australia in the exact same position we were in before Curtin pivoted to the American during WWII.

Albanese waffled in his speech about building links with other middling powers in the South East Asian region, but this is either fantasy or obfuscation. From the dawn of human civilisation, the global order has always been dominated by major powers. You must pick a side.

Thus Albanese can only mean one thing – Australian governments will pivot to China. This follows on very simply from the logic I have outlined as to why multiculturalism undermines Australia’s defence.

Pivoting from Great Britain to America in the 1940’s made sense because we were an Anglo Saxon nation swapping one Anglo Saxon alliance with another. Moreover we did so explicitly in order to fight a race war against an Asian invader.

While these racial realities are still of paramount importance to White Australians, they matter not a single jot to Australia’s rulers, nor to international relations. Australia is an economic zone populated by a mess of competing races, whose rulers explicitly repress the interests of White Australians. When weighing an alliance between a multicultural America and a multicultural China, the only thing that will matter to a multicultural Australian government “not shackled to our past” is power.

However, beyond exchanging a Judeo-American master for a Chinese one, there is hope.

Australia’s nationalists are laying the groundwork for a political party which represents White Australians. Such a party is the only political force which can defend Australia because it is the only force which can motivate White Australians to defend the country. Moreover there are tangible steps an Australian nationalist government can take to credibly defend Australia, which I will cover in coming weeks and months.